The angle of the tines before the pull and hold test predicts engagement of the tines in Micra leadless pacemaker implantation.

Background: Micra leadless pacemaker is secured to the myocardium by engagement of at least 2/4 tines confirmed with pull and hold test. However, the pull and hold test is sometimes difficult to assess. This study was performed to evaluate whether the angle of the tines before the pull and hold test predicts engagement of the tines in Micra leadless pacemaker implantation. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 93 consecutive patients (52.7% male, age 82.4 ± 9.4 years), who received Micra implantation from September 2017 to June 2020 at our institution. After deployment and before the pull and hold test, the angle of the visible tines to the body of the pacemaker was measured using the RAO view of the fluoroscopy image. The engagement of the tines was then confirmed with the pull and hold test. Results: A total of 326 tines were analyzed. The angle of the engaged tines was significantly lower than the non-engaged tines (9.2 degrees [4.0-14.0] vs. 16.6 degrees [14.2-18.8], p < .0001). All tines with angles <10 degrees were engaged. In higher angles, engagement could not be predicted. Conclusion: A low angle of the tines before the pull and hold test can predict engagement of the tines in Micra leadless pacemaker implantation. The tines which are already open after deployment may be presumed that they are engaged.

Risk factors for venous bleeding complication at the femoral puncture site after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Venous bleeding complication is often observed after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF), but the risk factors remain unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 570 consecutive patients who underwent catheter ablation of AF from April 2012 to March 2017. After the procedure, the sheaths were removed, and hemostasis was obtained by manual compression followed by application of rolled gauze with elastic bandage and continuous pressure to the puncture site. We evaluated the risk factors for venous bleeding complications defined as hemorrhage from the puncture site that needed recompression after removal of the elastic bandage and rolled gauze. RESULTS: After excluding 11 patients because of missing data, 559 patients (395 [70.7%] men, mean age: 65.6 ± 8.7 years) were included for analysis. Venous bleeding complication was observed in 213 patients (38.1%). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, low body mass index (BMI; odds ratio [OR] 0.95, 95% CI 0.90-1.00, P = .04), short compression time (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.68-0.88, P < .001), and antiplatelet therapy (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.09-3.16, P = .02) were independent risk factors for venous bleeding complication. CONCLUSIONS: Low BMI, short compression time, and antiplatelet therapy were independent risk factors for venous bleeding complication after catheter ablation of AF. Longer compression time may be needed for patients with low BMI and/or those receiving antiplatelet therapy.

A Novel Rotablator Technique (Low-Speed following High-Speed Rotational Atherectomy) Can Achieve Larger Lumen Gain: Evaluation Using Optimal Frequency Domain Imaging.

BACKGROUND: While the evaluation of burr speed was discussed regarding platelet aggregation, the association between platform speed and acute lumen gain of rotational atherectomy remains unknown. METHODS: Through the evaluation of the potential of low-speed rotational atherectomy (LSRA) in in-vitro experiments, minimum lumen diameter (MLD) and minimum lumen area (MLA) after conventional high-speed rotational atherectomy (HSRA group) and those after LSRA following HSRA (LSRA+HSRA group) treated by 1.5 mm burrs were measured by optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) in 30 consecutive human lesions. RESULTS: The in-vitro experiments demonstrated that MLD and MLA after LSRA+HSRA were significantly larger (MLD: LSRA+HSRA=1.50 ±0.05 mm, HSRA= 1.43 ±0.05 mm, p=0.015; MLA: LSRA+HSRA= 1.90 ±0.17 mm2, HSRA= 1.71±0.11 mm2, and p= 0.037), requiring more crossing attempts (LSRA= 134 ±20 times, HSRA= 72 ±11 times, and p< 0.001). In human studies, there was no significance in reference vessel diameter and lesion length before the procedure between two groups. MLDs after LSRA+HSRA were significantly larger than those in HSRA (LSRA+HSRA= 1.22 ±0.16 mm, HSRA= 1.07 ±0.14 mm, and p= 0.0078), while MLAs after LSRA+HSRA tended to be larger (LSRA+HSRA= 1.79 ±0.51 mm2, HSRA= 1.55 ±0.47 mm2, and p= 0.19). There was no significance in the occurrence of in-hospital complication, including slow flow or no reflow, major dissection, and procedural myocardial infarction, between LSRA+HSRA and HSRA. CONCLUSIONS: LSRA can achieve larger lumen gain compared, whereas HSRA can pass calcified lesions easily. Combination of LSRA and HSRA is a safe and feasible strategy for severely calcified lesions in clinical practice.